When truth gets twisted: three ways to combat misinformation.

My job is to study people, specifically what motivates the decisions they make. I started when I was about seven years old. As a kid, nothing interested me more than the choices, personalities, homes and work of the characters on TV. The richest fodder for my young mind was syndicated situation comedies.


Shows like Three’s CompanyI Love Lucy, and The Odd Couple were built entirely on misunderstandings. Someone overheard half a conversation, misread a situation, or jumped to a conclusion. A single wrong assumption would spiral into a comedy of errors. Most importantly, the audience always knew the truth, which made watching the confusion unfold even funnier. Back then, misinformation made for great television.

But here’s the thing: the characters weren’t malicious. They were simply human. Today, misinformation is anything but funny. It’s never been more rampant or damaging. And while Lucy and Jack Tripper could wrap it all up in 30 minutes, today’s leaders, especially in the nonprofit world, are left trying to untangle real consequences and existential threats.

Behavioral science helps explain why misinformation spreads so easily and why it’s so hard to correct. Our brains are wired for efficiency, not accuracy. We fill in gaps, trust familiar sources and favor information that confirms what we already believe.

Falsehoods thrive because they tend to be simple, emotional, and easy to repeat. Facts, on the other hand, are often nuanced and slow to travel. For nonprofits, this dynamic poses a real challenge: how to communicate truth in a way that cuts through noise, earns trust, and doesn’t get lost in the scroll. Here are three ways to respond to misinformation.


1

Lead With Truth, Not Correction

What we’re fighting here is called the continued-influence effect. Once people hear false information, it lingers even after it’s corrected. Our brains don’t easily “delete” it. They file the correction next to it. That’s why repeating a myth, even to debunk it, can unintentionally reinforce it.

So focus on pre-bunking, not just debunking. When you see misinformation circulating about your work or issue, lead with accurate, compelling truth rather than amplifying the falsehood. Use positive framing (“Here’s what we know...”) instead of negative (“That’s not true...”). Keep your explanation short and your message calm. The more confident and concise your tone, the more likely your message will stick.

2

Keep Messages Simple and Familiar

Our brains trust information that feels easy to process. The behavioral principle is called cognitive ease. Simplicity, repetition and familiarity all increase believability. That’s why misinformation, which is often short and emotionally charged, spreads faster than nuanced facts.

To fight this, we need to strip away jargon and complexity. Use plain language, repetition and stories that make your message memorable. When possible, connect new information to what people already believe. Familiarity acts as a bridge to credibility. In times of uncertainty, simple, confident messaging doesn’t just cut through noise; it becomes an anchor of trust.

3

Acknowledge Emotion Before Evidence

Affective reasoning and identity-protective cognition cause people not to process information purely rationally. Instead, they evaluate it through the lens of identity and emotion. When something feels like a threat to their worldview or community, even solid facts can backfire.

To counter this, begin by affirming shared values and empathy before presenting data. Show that you understand why people might feel uncertain or skeptical. This lowers defensiveness. For example: “It’s natural to have questions about how programs are funded. Here’s how we ensure transparency.” Facts rarely change minds alone; empathy clears the path for them to land.


 

Those old sitcoms made confusion look harmless. In real life, misinformation distorts the work of people who are trying to do good and diverts energy from our most pressing issues.

I know it’s exhausting to keep correcting what should be obvious truths. Compassion isn’t partisan. Service isn’t self-interest. Still, I’m not ready to give up on happy endings. Misunderstanding can be overcome. What once fueled chaos can, with patience and honesty, lead to understanding.

Toward clarity,

Kevin


Kevin Smith, Principal
 

Kevin Smith is co-founder and lead strategist of the social impact communications firm For Goodness Sakes. Working on behalf of nonprofits, foundations and government agencies, the firm helps people adopt life-changing behavior shifts using the principles of behavioral science.


 
 
Back to Insights
Kevin Smith

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Next
Next

The Courage to Fix Things: Ways to Refocus for Greater Impact